How should in-progress cases be treated when an associate leaves a practice?

In the context of dental practices, when an associate leaves a practice, it is important to recognize that the associate has no legal obligation to return to complete in-progress cases. This stems from the principle that once the associate disassociates from the practice, their contractual or employment obligations, including the completion of ongoing cases, typically cease.

However, while the associate may not be legally bound, ethical considerations still play a crucial role in ensuring continuity of care for patients. Practices generally have procedures in place to manage ongoing cases when a provider departs, ensuring that patients receive the necessary care promptly and effectively.

The other options involve expectations that may not align with the legal and ethical framework governing dental practices. For instance, expecting the associate to complete all cases contradicts the reality of their departure and their autonomy in choosing to continue or cease involvement with those patients. Likewise, the notion of assigning cases to another dentist without regard for the departing associate's status, while practical, does not consider the legalities regarding patient relationships. Lastly, informing patients about case delays, while important for transparency, doesn't address the broader issues of responsibility and continuity of care.

Thus, while the most legally defensible and straightforward stance is that the associate has no obligation to return to the