If a patient opts for tooth extraction instead of a root canal due to financial constraints, what can be done?

When a patient chooses tooth extraction over a root canal due to financial constraints, it demonstrates the importance of understanding both the patient's needs and the ethical obligations of the dental professional. Adjusting the fee for the root canal to provide a discount can be a viable solution, as it keeps the patient's well-being in focus and may make necessary treatment more accessible. This approach aligns with the principle of beneficence in dental practice, which advocates promoting the health and welfare of patients.

Offering a discount allows the patient to receive the necessary care while alleviating some financial burden, which can lead to better long-term health outcomes. It fosters an environment of trust and communication between the patient and the dentist, showing that the practitioner values the patient's health and financial situation.

Considering the other options, referring the patient for financial assistance may not be directly accessible or effective, as the process can be complicated and not guaranteed. Performing the root canal at no charge may not be sustainable for the dental practice. Encouraging the patient to find a new dentist could appear dismissive and does not support the patient in receiving appropriate care. Focusing on adjusting the fee provides a practical, ethical, and compassionate solution in this scenario.