If you discover no decay in a patient’s records after transfer but the previous dentist recommended fillings, what is your next step?

Study for the PSI California Dental Law and Ethics Exam. Enhance your preparation with engaging flashcards and challenging multiple choice questions, complete with hints and detailed explanations. Achieve your certification with confidence!

The best course of action in this situation is to inform the patient of your findings and recommend the appropriate treatment based on your examination. When transitioning patient care, it is crucial to be transparent with the patient regarding any discrepancies between previous treatment recommendations and your own findings. This approach not only fosters trust but also empowers the patient to make informed decisions about their dental health.

By discussing your assessment, you enable the patient to understand why you have a different perspective than the previous dentist. This is essential because there might be underlying factors that the patient needs to consider, and discussing your findings ensures they are knowledgeable about their current dental status. It also allows for a dialogue where the patient can ask questions and express any concerns they have about the previous recommendations.

Such clarity and transparency are foundational in maintaining a strong patient-practitioner relationship and upholding ethical standards in dental practice. This method aligns with the ethical principles of beneficence and respect for patient autonomy, ensuring that the patient is an active participant in their own care decisions.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy